Submission guide
Show the work behind the words.
AI can help you create, but it cannot replace real product use. Every submission is reviewed manually after it has already been published.
Strong submissions
- Use a UgurLabs project in a real or demo environment.
- Show sanitized screenshots, recordings, commands, or results.
- Verify technical claims and identify prerequisites.
- Explain limitations, tradeoffs, and personal decisions.
- Teach something useful even when the conclusion is critical.
Quality-gate failures
- Generic AI-generated text without firsthand evidence.
- Fabricated screenshots, output, results, or testimonials.
- Materially inaccurate or unverified technical claims.
- Plagiarized work or content published on a channel you do not control.
- Exposed tenant information, identities, secrets, or confidential data.
Scoring
The 100-point rubric
Usefulness
30
Helps the intended audience solve a real problem or make a better decision.
Technical accuracy
25
Claims, steps, commands, and product behavior are correct and verifiable.
Real-world evidence
20
Shows sanitized screenshots, recordings, commands, results, or a reproducible walkthrough.
Clarity and depth
15
Is understandable, structured, and sufficiently complete for its format.
Originality and judgment
10
Adds firsthand experience, limitations, choices, and insight beyond generic text.
Not accepted
Accepted and showcased
Accepted and gift eligible
Required disclosure
Be clear before selection.
Place this disclosure in the article, video description, or another clearly visible location before submitting the work:
This content was submitted to the UgurLabs Technical Education Fellowship monthly recognition round. Selected submissions may receive a Claude subscription gift.